Thursday, February 09, 2012

VA: Hunters Helping Lynchburg Control Deer

Deer_in_yard_(Fairfax_County_Gov.).jpgLynchburg, Va., has found an interesting, seemingly unconventional way to address its deer overcrowding problem.

It doesn’t involve deer contraception or some other expensive, ineffective, “non-lethal” means of control.

It doesn’t involve spending thousands of dollars of the taxpayers’ money to hire contracted sharpshooters.

And it doesn’t require a lot of bureaucratic oversight.

What could this groundbreaking approach be, you ask?

Lynchburg is actually letting everyday hunters hunt the deer.

Can you believe it?

The news has been filled of late with stories about cities, developments and parks struggling to find ways to manage ever-growing deer populations. We ran a story just recently about Washington, D.C.’s Rock Creek Park dismissing out of hand the idea of allowing volunteer hunters to control the park’s ballooning deer herd, instead opting to use paid sharpshooters and implement an expensive deer birth control program.

Lynchburg, in contrast, allows hunting on properties where the owner has been issued either a kill permit, shotgun discharge permit, or bow discharge permit. The landowner—not the hunter—must annually apply for the appropriate permit.

Where property damage from deer is verifiable, a kill permit may be issued to the landowner if the city deems the property safe for the discharge of archery equipment or shotguns—remember again that we’re talking about hunting within the city limits. Archery hunters wishing to assist must be specifically named on the kill permit. No acreage minimums are required for issuance of kill permits. Where property damage from deer is not verifiable, archery hunting is still an option on properties where the owners have been issued a bow discharge permit or a shotgun discharge permit (for properties of 25 acres or more).

Once a landowner has that permit in hand, any hunter named on the permit can hunt antlerless deer on the property in accordance with all other Virginia hunting laws, tagging requirements and bag limits. A few other common sense rules apply, such as restrictions on shooting over roadways or sidewalks or towards buildings, but there aren’t a lot of other hoops hunters have to jump through.

The ABC affiliate in Lynchburg, WSET-TV, ran a story about this program on Feb. 7 that highlighted an organization known as “Fix Lynchburg’s Deer Problem” that is helping pair landowners with hunters to remove excess antlerless deer.

You can read/watch that story here: www.wset.com/story/16698025/bow-hunters-control-deertick-population

It’s worth noting that the group, via its Facebook page, offers two clarifications to the WSET story that help paint a more accurate picture of who they are and what they do:

1. We are NOT paid to harvest deer. We do so voluntarily and at no expense to landowners.
2. The term “licensed professional” is somewhat misleading. We are licensed according to state hunting regulations. The term “professional” typically denotes someone who is involved in a paid profession, which this is NOT.

We are extremely dedicated to what we do, we are good at it, and we strive to behave professionally in a voluntary arrangement between ourselves and our landowners.

In other words, they are everyday hunters putting their expertise to work, free of charge, for the benefit of their community. The hunters themselves gain extra hunting opportunities, the city’s deer problem is getting solved, and the venison is donated to food banks and charities though the Hunters for the Hungry program.

It’s a win-win-win for everyone.

The group says its mission is to “[bring] together Lynchburg bowhunters and landowners to safely, effectively and efficiently fix Lynchburg city’s deer population problem while saving taxpayer money for legitimate needs.”

That almost makes too much sense to be true. But if Lynchburg and other cities participating in Virginia’s Urban Archery Season can make it work, why can’t it work nationwide?


Posted by Justin McDaniel on Thursday, February 09, 2012
Comments
This is a great idea that I would like to see spread to more of the United States of America. If the deer population is out of control and hunters are willing to reduce it for free it seems like the best case scenario. There should be no reason that the state should have to hire these sharp shooters. The term for a win-win relationship where both parties benefit is called mutualism and that is exactly what we have when hunters keep the deer population under control. Without hunters the deer population would skyrocket because there are really not enough natural predators in these neighborhoods/urban environments, therefore predators (hunters) need to be introduced into the environment to keep the numbers under control. Hunters are the best predators to introduce into the urban environment because they are easy to control, they give you feedback with how they did (how many deer they killed), and in some cases will actually pay to take care of your population problems. There are a lot more areas around even where I live that could seriously use some deer population control and why not take advantage of the resources that are at our fingertips by using the great social networking site Facebook. Being an avid hunter myself and knowing how hard it can be to find a good place to go hunting these days I think that if this idea received enough publicity it could be a great success.

From David on Sunday, December 02, 2012 8:15 PM
Name:*
Email:
Comments:*
Enter the above code here:
(Code is case insensitive. You can put lower or upper case.)
Can't read? Try different words.
 
 
HOME   |   SUBMIT TOPIC

RSS feed RSS feed.
Hunters' Blog is the main way the editors of www.huntersrights.org can express their opinions on key topics, and from time to time we may have guest bloggers, too. But we don't necessarily choose all the topics ourselves. If there is an issue you want us to address, or a situation you want clarified, we encourage you to let us know about it. Just click on Submit Topic and send it in.


RECENT POSTS

ARCHIVES